Written by Godinci.

Dali time-watch


For Ages people have wondered about the nature of ‘time’; although, we all know intuitively what time is, defining time seems somehow to give us a substantial headache and has hold us in some kind of deadlock that avoid us to understand it properly.

Let us therefore have a brief look to what modern science has to say on this subject; after all, science claims to be the sole legitimate truth-alignments methodology that enables us to liberate us from the vicious claws of Nature, by investigating, understanding and formulating Her laws in precise manner, so that She might not only be tamed, but above all is forced to reveal our essence.


Newton believed that ‘time’ passes by uniformly, and is totally distinct from physical things, although both could be brought in relation to each other. For Newton ‘space’ and ‘time’ were not mere abstractions, such as numbers, but factual – i.e. they have substance, be it material or immaterial.

In addition to that, Newton postulated that time was absolute because, according to him, ‘time’ is considered as being the same for everyone and everywhere. The fact that time, according to Newton, is totally distinct of physical things implies that time is not simple something that is measured by the motion of physical things, although a relation might exist between them since motion happens in time, yet, time isn’t motion.

G. Leibniz, Newton’s contemporary, believed in the factuality of space (i.e. space has features) but insisted that time in itself has no substance, hence, no factuality – i.e. time, according to Leibniz, is a pure (mental) abstraction. In other words, in Leibniz view, time only came into being when creatures had brains that were endowed with enough mental containing capacity to think abstract.

Our modern view of time rest on A. Einstein absurd ideas that time and space, although factual, are not separate from each other, as Newton tended to believe, but interdependent and interwoven with each other, to form what he calls ‘space-time’, that in the presence of matter-energy bends the geodesics of space-time itself.


Furthermore in Einstein’s concept of time, time isn't only a dimension but also related to the speed of light that is assumingly constant for all observers.
This allows space-time to produce all kinds of wonders of bliss, ranging from gravity wormholes to easily get rid of your stepmother, time-travel that would allow you to assist your own birth, twin paradoxes were the much older sister has become much younger than her younger sister, run-away universes that accelerate proportional to human stupidity, and numerous regenerations of the death that let Jesus resurrection of the Christian narrative look stupid.

Of course, we should not ponder too much about these entertaining absurdities because A. Einstein, the hero of the plot said, I quote:

“If at first the idea is not absurd, then there is no hope for it”

Although this quotations sounds stimulating we might wonder what happens if the idea, after a long-time, remains absurd?

Nonsense can be funny, but please, let us keep nonsense for pure entertainment purpose.

What is time according to Godinci?

Time, according to Godinci, is a relational abstract that measures (observable) spatial and/or structural change. There are two kinds of change

  1. Measurable change
  2. Immeasurable change

Measurable change requires physical and referential/associational things to allow us to relate and quantify this change – matter particles, and their conglomerates (be the animate or not) have such qualities. Immeasurable change is all change that occurs in the absence of any tangible physical reference but still involves a dynamic process.

To better understand immeasurable change just think of someone who is in a state of dreaming; although his/her thoughts are active, within the thought there is no quantifiable and measurable reality, only sequences within the thought, such as before, during, after, and so on. (Just ask a person that wakes-up from a dream how much time went by between two successive events within the dream – assuming she/he was not dreaming about time passing by on clocks.)
Brief, even though we’re dealing here with change, for us, it’s not longer measurable change, and so, ‘time’, in the absence of 'measurable relational or associational things' becomes a meaningless concept; just as energy becomes meaningless without use and/or transformation.

Not understanding those things leaves us in darkness!


However, even though the concept of space and energy, in the absence of measurable things, are abstracts, they are still factual because they have substance; hence, differentiate from pure abstracts that bear no relation with the true nature of whatever what.
In other words, ‘factuals’, be they contingent or not, although expressible by means of abstracts, are in contrast to our views non-relative; and since all what is contingent is concrete (tangible), and finds its being in the factual non-contingent, means that the more tangency our abstracts have with the true nature of things the less relative and more concrete our understanding becomes.

Now, given that the evolution of all things is always state- and environment-dependent, implies that measurable relational or associational change – such as time is in physics – becomes a relative attribute. Indeed, space is factual, thus, all things (be they animate or not) moving and residing in space become subject to space, and is why moving and stationary clocks will not tick at the same rate.

Yet, may it be clear that this has nothing to do with time being a dimension, but find its roots in the fact that all things, hence, also any measuring devices, are subject to factual space.
In brief, we might be pleased, for entertainment purpose, with the way how physics came to understand time, yet, at the end of the day we’ll have to admit that time is nothing more than a relational attribute that measures the rate (evolution) of rotational, translational and/or vibrational related change.

For all simplicity you can forget all about Einstein's time nonsense, and just stick, for daily purposes ,with the commonsense Italian notion of time – see YouTube hereunder.

Also read: What if dickheads were found? The explanatory power of Darwinism.
The Higgs...a back of bricks!


About the author:


Godinci is an independent organization that is not political, commercial or religious motivated and strives to:

  1. Restore a truth related holistic picture of Nature and self
  2. Lay down the blueprint for the construction, preservation and unfoldment of a sustainable global-society
  3. Develop and design all tangible means that facilitates the principles of harmonation and maximize our becoming towards our cosmic purpose

Source reference:

Picture credit:

  1. Painting of watch by Dali: http://www.fengshuidana.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/387796277_858f2fb5b9.jpg
  2. Space-time cartoon: http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a361/Metacrock/einstein-relativity.jpg
  3. Cartoon about meaningless things: http://oolongiv.files.wordpress.com/2007/09/calvinhobbes.jpg